The Supreme Court recently considered whether a plaintiff has a private right of action for damages against a health care provider under the Health Care and Consumer Billing and Disclosure Protection Act. Anderson v. Ochsner Health Sys., 2013-2970 (La. 7/1/14) -- So.3d--. The trial court had commented that the text of the Act neither explicitly grants nor prohibits a private right of action. However, based on the trial court's review of the language of the statute, judicial opinions interpreting the statute, and the purpose of the Act, it held that the legislature intended to create a private cause of action. The Louisiana Supreme Court affirmed the trial court's decision, citing to the legislature's failure to expressly prohibit an individual remedy in the Act, the legislative intent to protect consumers, and the constitutional right of access to the courts.
Disclaimer
Keogh Cox & Wilson, Ltd. provides this blog as a public service for general information only. The materials contained herein may not reflect the most current legal developments or even express the opinion of all or even most of Keogh Cox attorneys. Such material does not constitute legal advice or form any attorney-client relationship. Keogh Cox and all contributing author(s) expressly disclaim all liability to any person with respect to the contents of this Web site and Blog and expect that no reliance will be made upon the information provided.