In Lavalais v. Gilchrist Const. Co., LLC, (La. App. 3 Cir. 2/4/15), the Third Circuit extended workers compensation benefits to an employee despite a finding that the employee provided false answers to a routine pre-employment health questionnaire. The Court determined that the employee’s untruthful answers did not directly relate to the injury and therefore did not trigger a forfeiture of workers compensation benefits under La. R.S. 23:1208.1.Lavalais sustained injuries to his neck, back, and right knee in a car accident while in the employ of Gilchrist. Prior to the accident, Lavalais had suffered college football and accident-related injuries. Despite its finding that the plaintiff has been untruthful, the Court narrowly construed La. R.S. 23:1208.1 and held that Lavalais’ untruthfulness did not trigger forfeiture of benefits because the defendant did not meet its burden to show the prior injuries made re-injury “inevitable” or “very likely to occur.”
Disclaimer
Keogh Cox & Wilson, Ltd. provides this blog as a public service for general information only. The materials contained herein may not reflect the most current legal developments or even express the opinion of all or even most of Keogh Cox attorneys. Such material does not constitute legal advice or form any attorney-client relationship. Keogh Cox and all contributing author(s) expressly disclaim all liability to any person with respect to the contents of this Web site and Blog and expect that no reliance will be made upon the information provided.